<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>We Are Social - Latest Comments in Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://wearesocial.disqus.com/real_time_reputation_management/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:13:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-45767758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;we can't control this kind of thing though there are people who will be your voice specially if you've establish your own reputation on them. their voices are definitely more important than yours in this kind of situation&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">search engine optimization</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:13:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-6367687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Creating brands worth evangelizing about is often misunderstood. The connection between the core values - the soul of the company and the soul of the customer - is why customers evangelize. They have found a temple of core value at which to worship. It’s mythic. It’s epic. The brand becomes icon because it connects to the subconscious yearnings of the customer, imprinting on the brain. The pictured emotional experience becomes a conduit through which the customer can again be touched by those core values.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those pictures and emotions then become language in the brain of the customer. And it’s the language of evangelism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brand4profit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:01:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-5868734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well handled Robin - great example of how being active in a community means that you can call on that community in times of need - but surely also a veiled compliment that people think your team could mimic Stephen Fry's style!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">graeme wood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-5832532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Scobleizer/status/1173601591" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/Scobleizer/status/1173601591"&gt;More from Mr Scoble&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes @nb42 Stephen Fry does tweet himself, but he also has a PR team that is clued in and looking out for him. See this: &lt;a href="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/realtime-reputation-management/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/02/realtime-reputation-management/"&gt;http://bit.ly/5exm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robin Grant</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-5786289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well done Robin! Lucky you have a small army of Twitterers under your thumb (us!) to correct err the incorrect! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lolly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:32:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-5762926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Spot on, Robin. That's what I call responsive tweeting followed up by blog clarification. As Robert says, text-book... ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rax Lakhani</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:59:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-5761286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In my case it was another PR firm who was saying his tweets were not his. I am sorry for passing that along because it turned out to be incorrect, but there are several other celebrities who are not doing their own tweets, so it sounded plausible. Glad it got cleared up so fast and you provide a text-book case of how to respond to incorrect information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real-time reputation management</title><link>http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/01/realtime-reputation-management/#comment-5758357</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm somewhat amazed that anyone could mistake Stephen Fry's unique, individualistic tweets for some PR clone. Hell, his Tweets are more genuine than most Twitterers out there!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">almostwitty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:22:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>